arXiv (All)
open access
Subgroup comparisons within and across studies in meta-analysis
Meta-analyses of published subgroup-level data may yield different interaction estimates depending on how the available data are weighted across studies. In particular, the difference between meta-analytic subgroup-specific effects need not equal the meta-analysis of within-study subgroup difference
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Addressing Selective Reporting Bias in Meta-Analysis of Dependent Effect Sizes: A Tutorial in R#29864
- Addressing Selective Reporting Bias in Meta-Analysis of Dependent Effect Sizes: A Tutorial in R#16562
- Addressing Selective Reporting Bias in Meta-Analysis of Dependent Effect Sizes: A Tutorial in R#16205
- Supplementary Material: Back-Transformations in Random-Effects Meta-Analysis - Impact and Interpretation#462567
- Consistent Bayesian meta-analysis on subgroup specific effects and interactions#1491450
Record · ID 1491426
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive