arXiv (All)
open access
Consistent Bayesian meta-analysis on subgroup specific effects and interactions
Clinical trials commonly report effects on the full study population as well as for patient subgroups. Random-effects meta-analyses of subgroup-specific effects and treatment-by-subgroup interactions might be misaligned, especially when subgroups contribute differently to study populations. We show
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Subgroup comparisons within and across studies in meta-analysis#1491426
- From Five-Number Summary to Absolute Heterogeneity: Recent Methodological Advances in Meta-Analysis With Continuous Outcomes.#334988
- Co-Supervised Tree Synthesis for Interpretable Subgroup Identification and Honest Treatment Effect Inference in Randomized Trials#1199201
- Two-stage Adaptive Design Cluster Randomised Trials#785119
- Two-stage Adaptive Design Cluster Randomised Trials#783529
Record · ID 1491450
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive