CanLII
metadata only
Peters v. Peters First Nation
Decided: 2026-10-28. Docket: T-3167-25. Citation: 2026 CanLII 114302 (FC). Administrative law — Interlocutory injunctions — RJR-MacDonald test — Whether irreparable harm would flow if the injunction is denied — Harm must be unavoidable and not curable by damages or other means — Tripartite test is conjunctive and failure on irreparable harm is fatal — Injunction motion dismissed | Administrative law — Interlocutory injunctions — Irreparable harm and litigation prejudice — Whether procedural or strategic harm, including mootness risk, constituted irreparable harm — Ability to amend the Notice of Application considered as avoidance — Increased litigation costs treated as remediable by a cost award — Injunction motion dismissed | Evidence — Affidavit evidence — Particularity, hearsay, causati
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- R v Slippery#1204088
- R v IA#1039747
- R v Ramsay#1204086
- R. v. J.K.#1435193
- Peters, Application for Set Aside by the Secretary of State for Justice [2025] PBSA 88 (11 April 2025)#356281
Record · ID 1492983
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive