PsyArXiv
metadata only
Mechanical and Psychological Domains of Thought are Analogically Asymmetrical
Psychology and physics are two core domains of human cognition. Little is known about their epistemic relation. Does our understanding of common physical-mechanical systems better inform our understanding of psychology, or vice versa? To answer this question, we compared analogies that explain one d
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Mechanical and Psychological Domains of Thought are Analogically Asymmetrical#1494281
- Cognitive Proportionality in Physical Theory Construction: Toward Computational Approaches in Philosophy of Physics -Artificial Intelligence-#90211
- NEW PHYSICS. PHYSICS OF MEANINGS. SPACE Elimination of Geometric Nominalism: Deconstruction of the Cognitive Artifact of "Void" and Affirmation of the Material Continuum#72645
- Enactivism and Cognitive Science: Triple Review of J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, and E. A. Di Paolo (eds.), Enaction: Towards a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science; Anthony Chemero, Radical Embodied Cognitive Science; and Mark Rowlands, The New Science of the Mind”#764491
- Models and Analogies in Science#739859
Record · ID 1494155
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive