ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of IV PCA and Wound Infusion After Repair of Pectus Excavatum
Postoperative pain management is a major problem after repair of pectus excavatum.Various methods of pain management have been introduced. However, the effects of continuous wound infusion of local anesthetics through ON-Q catheters were not well evaluated in pectus surgery. Therefore, we conducted prospective randomized controlled study to compare the effects of IV PCA and continuous wound infusion after repair of pectus excavatum.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Trial of Closed Hemorrhoidectomy Under Local Perianal Block Versus Spinal Anesthesia#1475151
- Hemodynamic Repercussions of the Correction (Surgical and Non Surgical) of Pectus Excavatum-type Thoracic Deformities#1478461
- MAC vs TIVA Ambulatory Breast Augmentation#1451875
- Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery#1125355
- Risk Factors for Deep Sternal Wound Infection After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting#1369599
Record · ID 1499437
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive