NCBI PubMed Central
open access
Reliability and readability of five large language models in answering patient-oriented questions about rectal prolapse: a comparative study.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluation of the performance of large language models in responding to medical questions related to multiple sclerosis: A case study of large language models including ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok and Copilot.#174400
- Large Language Models in Healthcare and Medical Applications: A Review#376936
- Large Language Models in Healthcare and Medical Domain: A Review#340990
- Current applications and challenges in large language models for patient care: a systematic review#359602
- ChatGPT v.s. Human in Writing a Preoperative Visit Sheet#1100875
Record · ID 1501184
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive