CanLII
metadata only
Migiro v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
Decided: 2026-10-29. Docket: IMM-30671-26. Citation: 2026 CanLII 114963 (FC). Citizenship and immigration — Stay of removal — PRRA judicial review — Whether the Applicant met the three-part test for a stay of removal — Serious question assumed without conclusively determining — Irreparable harm not demonstrated — Balance of convenience favoured Respondent under Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, subs. 48(2) — Motion dismissed | Citizenship and immigration — Stay of removal — Risk assessment — Whether risks already adjudicated and dismissed could be redetermined on a stay motion — Risks raised adjudicated and dismissed by Refugee Protection Division and PRRA Officer — Court’s role on stay motion not to redetermine previous risk assessments — Ambagahapathirage v Canada (Citizenship and
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Prudent Financial Services Inc. v. Saggu#1166766
- Ali v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1001762
- Armota v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1001763
- Aviles Garcia v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1415430
- Lopez Gomez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1236048
Record · ID 1501614
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive