CanLII
metadata only
R. v. Chisholm
Decided: 2026-10-27. Docket: COA-25-CR-0492. Citation: 2026 ONCA 767 (CanLII). Criminal and statutory offences — Appeal from conviction — Unreasonable verdict — Whether guilty verdict was the only reasonable conclusion — Human trafficking and procuring convictions based on complainant evidence plus video surveillance, text messages, phone records and advertisements — Test for unreasonable verdict, R. v. C.P. applied — Appeal dismissed | Evidence — Witness credibility — Confirmatory evidence — Trial judge may accept some, all or none of a witness’ evidence — Whether confirmatory evidence can restore belief in parts of an unreliable witness’s account — Video footage, texts, phone records used to confirm material parts — Authorities cited, R. v. R.E.M. and R. v. Kehler — No error found | Crim
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- R. v. Moshfeghi Zadeh#1501610
- R. v. Desir#1204077
- R. v. Akohene-Mensah#1266825
- R v Carbert#1204087
- R. v. Abdullahi#1266823
Record · ID 1501616
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive