Political Regimes: _A Dynamic and Falsifiable_ Ontological Cartography

Traditional political typologies (monarchy, republic, dictatorship) are often static or normative, failing to explain the dynamics of regime transitions and structural collapses. This article applies the "Identity Compass" model (Lamory, 2026) to political science, mapping regimes not as fixed points but as trajectories on a dynamic 16-meridian sphere. It posits that sociological entities emerge from universal identity functions (innate drives) and organize into three ontological zones: Synergy, Autonomy, and Blockage. A central innovation is the postulate of "pathological symbiosis": a Blockage regime persists only if its diametrically opposing entity also inverts its nature, creating a mutual structural lock. The analysis demonstrates that dynamic equilibrium (Synergy) constitutes full functionality, while Blockage states are structural anomalies dependent on the corruption of the opposite. The model offers a formal, falsifiable ontology of political regimes, establishing strict criteria for invalidation based on the absence of such symbiotic corruption. By linking regimes to innate drives, the framework suggests political trajectories are mechanical responses to existential needs rather than historical accidents.