Conceptio › Archive › PhilArchive
PhilArchive open access

The Norm We Withdraw: Domestication, Human Selection, and Responsibility for the Living

Dietrich, Pablo
PhilArchive · Papers
Open Source ↗
philosophy
Author's English translation of: Dietrich, Pablo. A norma que retiramos: domesticação, seleção humana e responsabilidade pelo vivo. Revista Tópicos 4 (38): 1-34, 2026. DOI: 10.70773/revistatopicos/792198151. Translation deposited at Zenodo, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23815536. This paper examines the responsibility of those who control the living conditions of animals rendered dependent on human intervention. A hypothetical case—that of a horse with a treatable injury being euthanized for economic reasons—is contrasted with the conservation of the Przewalski's horse through captive breeding and reintroduction. Both cases share a structure of managed dependency, yet they are not equivalent: conservation may sustain the flourishing of a living being, whereas killing brings it to an end. Drawing on a philosophy of normativity grounded in dependency on that which is not human-produced, a distinction is made between the vital norm (the constitutive conditions an organism receives) and the means of care (the resources produced to sustain it). Identifying the loss of a form of life is not, in itself, sufficient to establish that such a loss is prohibited; an explicit normative premise is required—namely, that those who establish or sustain a dependency must justify the withdrawal of viable care, without conflating a loss of profitability with an impossibility of providing such care. Resolution CFMV No. 1,000/2012 provides the regulatory basis for distinguishing between irreversible suffering, incompatibility with productive goals, and financial insufficiency. The analysis identifies what is lost, and the position held within a dependency relationship grounds a requirement for justification—though not an unlimited duty to preserve life. In the context of conservation, a distinction is drawn between the individual, the lineage, and the free-ranging population. The moral status of the animal in itself remains outside the scope of this argument.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 1507573
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive