arXiv (All)
open access
AI Slop and the Software Commons
We argue that AI slop in software development is creating a tragedy of the commons. Slop is cheap to generate but expensive to review, and its costs fall on shared resources such as reviewer capacity, which was limited even before AI assistants became widespread. Ostrom documented how communities av
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Exploring the Role of Large Language Models in Automated Code Review and Software Quality Enhancement#82737
- A Methodology for Investigating AI Patterns Prevalence in Software Repositories#329161
- Evaluation of Elicit, SciSpace and Nested Knowledge in replicating three systematic reviews#976910
- How Do Software Professionals Evaluate AI-Generated Code? (Registered Report)#361516
- Building AI-Intensive Software with AI: Early Results and a Cautionary Tale on Measuring Development Cost#458349
Record · ID 1537202
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive