CanLII
metadata only
Wang v. Canada (Attorney General)
Decided: 2026-11-02. Docket: T-1094-25. Citation: 2026 FC 1343 (CanLII). Administrative law — Judicial review — Reasonableness — CRA pandemic benefits eligibility — Whether decision unreasonable for failing to address corroborative cheque and deposit evidence — Vavilov reasonableness, justification and transparency — Misapprehension of evidence on material point — Application allowed in part, redetermination ordered (CERB determination upheld) | Evidence — Judicial review record — Admissibility — Applicant’s Record documents not before decision maker — Whether exceptions to record rule apply, including disputed content of administrative record — Authorities on record limits cited, including Access Copyright and Bernard — Dispute not resolved because unreasonableness found on agreed record
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Niazi v. Canada (Attorney General)#1415432
- Akintade v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)#1066664
- Sui v. Ontario (Attorney General)#1481032
- Marlin c. R.#824293
- Fearing v. Gardaworld Cash Services Canada Corporation#1347091
Record · ID 1538787
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive