OSF
open access
Scoring Two-Part Multiple-Choice Items: An IRT Model Comparison with Implications for Validity Arguments and Process Inference
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Reconsideration of the Assumptions about Latent Trait Values in Item Response Theory Models#134348
- Turkish MMLU Pro: Traceable Option Augmentation and Its Validity Limits in Turkish Multiple-Choice Evaluation#1109472
- The performance of ChatGPT and other large language models on multiple-choice questions in biomedical disciplines: A meta-analysis.#662850
- ReasonLab: A Controlled and Auditable Evaluation of Prompting Techniques for Multiple-Choice QA#1061749
- When Learned Context Planning Fails to Beat Strong Retrieval: A Controlled Study of Planning, Routing, and Reranking for Long-Context QA#1063187
Record · ID 158339
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive