CanLII
metadata only
Bratusa v. Doersam
Decided: 2026-11-06. Docket: COA-25-CV-1257. Citation: 2026 ONCA 792 (CanLII). Estates and wills — Dependant’s support — Succession Law Reform Act, s. 58, s. 57(1) — Whether deceased made adequate provision for proper support of dependants — Application brought by spouse and minor child — Life insurance proceeds and s. 72(1)(f) noted as potential asset — Proceeding to continue in Ontario — Appeal allowed | Procedure — Jurisdiction simpliciter — Real and substantial connection — Whether residence of support claimants is a presumptive connecting factor in dependant support — Club Resorts Ltd. v. Van Breda and Sinclair applied, Knowles v. Lindstrom considered — Presumption not rebutted — Ontario court has jurisdiction — Stay set aside | Evidence — Appeal — Fresh evidence — Whether social medi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- R v SSF#1615842
- R. v. Finck#1615843
- Anderson v Double M Construction Ltd.#1615840
- R. v Gushue#1615844
- Guillaume c. R.#1615835
Record · ID 1615829
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive