CanLII
metadata only
R v SAR
Decided: 2026-11-10. Docket: 2501-0253A. Citation: 2026 ABCA 359 (CanLII). Criminal and statutory offences — Appeal from conviction — Sexual assault — W(D) framework — Whether trial judge reversed burden of proof and presumption of innocence — Challenge to rejection of Appellant’s evidence as “did not happen” — Trial judge found Crown proved guilt beyond a reasonable doubt — No misapplication of W(D) found — Appeal dismissed | Evidence — Credibility and reliability — Common-sense inferences — Whether trial judge relied on ungrounded assumptions about consenting partners’ behaviour — Appellate review for palpable and overriding error under R v Kruk, 2024 SCC 7 — Findings characterised as common-sense, context-specific assessments grounded in the evidence — No reviewable error — Appeal dismi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- R. v. C.L.#1638940
- Alberta Union of Provincial Employees v Christenson Equities Ltd#1638949
- A.D.H. v. G.O.#1638950
- F.M. c. R.#1638941
- Talbot c. R.#1638942
Record · ID 1638948
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive