arXiv (All)
open access
Orbit: An Evidence-Grounded Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on IT Operations Reasoning
LLMs now support IT operations (ITOps), but benchmarks rarely show why a model fails. We present ORBIT, a benchmark of ITOps questions in three formats, namely multiple-choice, open-ended, and troubleshooting, with each question accompanied by a reference answer and a recorded source. An audit found
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Orbit: An Evidence-Grounded Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on IT Operations Reasoning#1653054
- Measuring Reasoning Quality in LLMs: A Multi-Dimensional Behavioral Framework#926044
- The Path Not Taken: Duality in Reasoning about Program Execution#126599
- RCCM: Diagnosing Gains and Harms in Reasoning-Prompt Transfer#1354554
- AAPO: Enhancing the Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs with Advantage Margin#141739
Record · ID 1659299
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive