PhilArchive
open access
A Graph-Theoretic Characterization of Biology in GD: Twelve Necessary and Sufficient Conditions under Structural Determination Theory
This paper develops a graph-theoretic characterization of what it is to be a biological organism, derived within Structural Determination Theory (SDT), a single-axiom meta-structural ontology. Working in SDT's determination dependency graph G_D, it identifies twelve structural conditions — bounded persistent identity, material throughflow, regulatory feedback, differentiation, information-processing integration, multi-scale organization, reproduction, and operationally-reused memory — and argues that their conjunction, together with a local-maximum principle under which an organism's boundary emerges rather than being stipulated, is both necessary and sufficient for organism-hood. Each condition is derived from an ontological prior on biology, shown independent by explicit counter-model, and jointly sufficient by structural-space analysis; the characterization is verified on a constructed representation of Escherichia coli and distinguished from vortices, crystals, viruses, and self-replicating machines. The account is meta-structural: it fixes the forced structural form of life while consigning all rates, mechanisms, and thresholds to entity-theory, and it is medium-independent, specifying a pattern rather than a substance. The static characterization is extended to the temporal life cycle — creation, dissolution (including natural death as the finite-fidelity shortfall of metabolic self-maintenance), heredity, growth, and four structural-dynamical laws for the life processes — and yields an explicit definition of life whose distinguishing core is self-maintenance rather than self-replication. The result is situated against autopoiesis, Integrated Information Theory, Constructor Theory, Rosen's relational biology, and the definitions-of-life tradition (the NASA definition, Koshland's seven pillars, Gánti's chemoton, Assembly Theory), to which it stands not as a rival but as a unifying meta-structural skeleton whose value is conceptual rather than predictive.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Law of Alignment: A Structural Meta-Constraint on Viability and Persistence Across Systems#715610
- The Unclosable Bridge_ Why Bounded Rational Methods Cannot Derive Ontological Finality#730983
- Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology#756889
- Infinitarianism: A Philosophy of the Unbounded. Structure and Extropy within Infinity#87631
- A Theory of Smarandache Structures: Volume II. Computational Sciences#716008
Record · ID 176186
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive