PhilArchive
open access
Phenomenology of Moral intent: Questioning stable Morality
This thesis examines the fragility of traditional ethical frameworks through the lens of phenomenology, using Raymond—an accountant turned cybercriminal—as a case study of "structural shocks" disrupting moral stability. Drawing on Kantian ethics, existentialist phenomenology, and Marxist critiques of ideology, it argues that morality is not an abstract, timeless foundation, but a lived experience continuously negotiated under changing material conditions. Through Raymond's trajectory from rule-bound deontologist to utilitarian rationalizer, the work illustrates how "situational ethics" emerge when structural support systems fail. It posits that moral intent—our conscious ethical agency—cannot be separated from the economic, sociological, and institutional contexts that shape it. Proposing "Institutional Scaffolding," "Cultural Embedded Virtues," and "Reflective Practice" as correctives, the thesis advocates for a reconstruction of ethical theory that accounts for material precarity and fosters collective resilience against moral instability. Ultimately, this work challenges readers to reconsider their assumptions about moral "certainty," suggesting that stable morality is neither possible nor desirable. Instead, it calls for a phenomenological approach to ethics that prioritizes lived experience, structural awareness, and ongoing critical engagement.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A New Teleology of Ethics#723944
- The Phenomenology of Moral Intent - Questioning the universal#93945
- Morality Ladder: A Graded Moral Regulation Model of Moral Agency Under Uncertainty#730194
- A Proposal for the Ethical Principles of Positive Leadership and the Social Pact (Corporate Ethics and Governance in Organizational Dynamics)#77768
- Causa Sui, the Supreme Polarity, and Moral Responsibility: How to Understand the Concept of a Person in Neo-Confucian Discourse#726831
Record · ID 204013
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive