PhilArchive
open access
Social Choice Phenomenology — A Critique of Sartre (Part 14)
In this article, we examine the definitions of social action proposed by Max Weber and Alfred Schutz, and we also discuss Schutz’s criticism of Weber’s theory of action. We point out that every process of action is the corresponding “post-choice state” of a choice.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Social Choice Phenomenology — A Critique of Sartre (Part 15)#719005
- Social Choice Phenomenology — A Critique of Sartre (Part 5)#713899
- Desires in Economics#114204
- Social Choice Phenomenology — A Critique of Sartre (Part 4)#100272
- Henry James, Paardenrennen, en Relatieve Deprivatie--Rational Choice Theory aan het Werk#702615
Record · ID 228708
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive