NCBI PubMed Central
open access
The role of large language models in the writing of surgical reviews: fact or fantasy?
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Fine-Tuned Large Language Models for Generating Multiple-Choice Questions in Anesthesiology: Psychometric Comparison With Faculty-Written Items / Carlos Ramon Hölzing, Charlotte Meynhardt, Patrick Meybohm, Sarah König, Peter Kranke#783909
- User Beware: Inaccuracy and Inconsistency of Large Language Models in Providing Precision Dosing Recommendations for Patients With Kidney Impairment-A Case Series.#1166962
- Comparing the performance of four mainstream large language models on medical literature review generation: a human expert evaluation in SMILE surgery.#67490
- Large Language Models' Ability to Assess Main Concepts in Story Retelling: A Proof-of-Concept Comparison of Human Versus Machine Ratings.#247720
- The Evolving Role of Large Language Models in Healthcare Research and Scientific Communication.#182329
Record · ID 342469
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive