NCBI PubMed Central
open access
Comparing the performance of four mainstream large language models on medical literature review generation: a human expert evaluation in SMILE surgery.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
Checking your browser - reCAPTCHA Checking your browser before accessing pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ... Click here if you are not automatically redirected after 5 seconds.
Related documents
- Fine-Tuned Large Language Models for Generating Multiple-Choice Questions in Anesthesiology: Psychometric Comparison With Faculty-Written Items / Carlos Ramon Hölzing, Charlotte Meynhardt, Patrick Meybohm, Sarah König, Peter Kranke#783909
- The role of large language models in the writing of surgical reviews: fact or fantasy?#342469
- Artificial intelligence-driven study selection in systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials, emulated trials and economic evaluation studies using large language models.#613345
- Systematic assessment of text summarization methods for biomedical literature from frequency methods to language models.#823499
- Enhancing the quality and trustworthiness of large language model-generated summaries of clinical oncology literature.#288943
Record · ID 67490 · SHA-256 52b7c08ddfd1c093
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive