OSF
open access
Beyond Human–AI Agreement: Evaluating Large Language Models for Content Validity Evidence
item-response-theorylarge-language-modelsmathematical-psychologyscale-developmentsocial-and-behavioral-sciences
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Does Reasoning Improve Psychological Depth in Large Language Models? It Depends on Who's Judging#1083274
- Human-Anchored Inference for Ranking New Models with Large Language Model Judges#1014189
- The Last Judgement: A Structural Threshold for Halting AI Progress#101573
- Beyond Symmetric Agents: Cognitive Diversity and Multi-Agent Debate in Small Language Models#1130717
- Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?#16617
Record · ID 372314
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive