Springer Nature OA
open access
CC BY 4.0
Negotiating epistemic authority in the age of generative AI: AI reliance, responsibility, and usage intensity among GenAI-using coaching professionals
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Critical Thinking with Generative AI: A Constraint-First Design Pilot of a Thinking-Partner Intervention#1142330
- From Protocols to Evidence: Bounded Claims for AI in Service of the Common Good#673492
- Voices of Freelance Professional Writers on AI: Limitations, Expectations, and Fears#1142534
- Domain knowledge, ethical acumen, and query capabilities (DEQ): a framework for generative AI use in education and knowledge work#19969
- Dataset of GenAI-Assisted Information Problem Solving in Education#973037
Record · ID 428753
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive