Position: AI Governance Needs ISO-like Interoperability Protocols, Not Just Laws
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
[2608.14568] Position: AI Governance Needs ISO-like Interoperability Protocols, Not Just Laws Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Search arXiv Press Enter to search · Advanced search Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2608.14568 (cs) [Submitted on 30 May 2026] Title: Position: AI Governance Needs ISO-like Interoperability Protocols, Not Just Laws Authors: Azmine Toushik Wasi , Mst Rafia Islam , Mahfuz Ahmed Anik , Taki Hasan Rafi , Md Manjurul Ahsan , Dong-Kyu Chae View a PDF of the paper titled Position: AI Governance Needs ISO-like Interoperability Protocols, Not Just Laws, by Azmine Toushik Wasi and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: As Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems become deeply integrated into critical global infrastructure, the urgency for robust governance frameworks has intensified. However, current approaches, led by jurisdiction-specific laws, policies, and voluntary frameworks such as the EU AI Act, China's algorithm governance, and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework in the U.S., create a fragmented regulatory landscape. In this position paper, we argue that \textbf{\textit{AI governance must be built not on laws alone, but on ISO-like interoperability protocols that enable standardized, machine-readable risk communication across borders}}. Drawing on the success of the GDPR, which was operationalized through standards like ISO 27001 and Privacy by Design, we propose the development of standardized AI \textit{nutrition labels} containing unified metrics for bias, energy usage, and data provenance to facilitate cross-jurisdictional compliance. These manifests would lower barriers for small and medium enterprises (SMEs), reduce redundant regulatory efforts, and build public trust. The paper addresses concerns that standards may stifle innovation by advocating for modular, versioned protocols designed to evolve in tandem with technological change. Overall, we call for a shift from siloed legal compliance toward interoperable technical conformance, enabling a shared global language for responsible AI deployment. Comments: Accepted to ICML 2026 Position Paper Track (Spotlight) (OpenReview: this https URL ) Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ; Computers and Society (cs.CY); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) Cite as: arXiv:2608.14568 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2608.14568v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14568 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Azmine Toushik Wasi [ view email ] [v1] Sat, 30 May 2026 14:58:24 UTC (70 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Position: AI Governance Needs ISO-like Interoperability Protocols, Not Just Laws, by Azmine Toushik Wasi and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.CY cs.GT cs.HC References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab) Major funding support from
Related documents
- Position: AI Governance Needs ISO-like Interoperability Protocols, Not Just Laws#610071
- AI governance: themes, knowledge gaps and future agendas#976429
- The Information Conflict Triad: Toward a Unified Governance Framework Integrating AI Weaponization, Fake News Countermeasures, and Cyber Legal Standards#120642
- There Is No Agency Without Attention#700458
- Ethical AI Governance in Modern Enterprises: A Comprehensive Framework for the 21st Century#1028115
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive