When Does the Best Sampling Temperature Rise with the Budget? Sufficient Conditions for Pass@k
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
[2608.14665] When Does the Best Sampling Temperature Rise with the Budget? Sufficient Conditions for Pass@k Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Search arXiv Press Enter to search · Advanced search Computer Science > Machine Learning arXiv:2608.14665 (cs) [Submitted on 1 Aug 2026] Title: When Does the Best Sampling Temperature Rise with the Budget? Sufficient Conditions for Pass@k Authors: Changsu Jeong (Independent Researcher) View a PDF of the paper titled When Does the Best Sampling Temperature Rise with the Budget? Sufficient Conditions for Pass@k, by Changsu Jeong (Independent Researcher) View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: The temperature that maximizes pass@$k$ is often low for a small sampling budget and higher for a large budget. This pattern has been reported from Codex through recent multi-sample inference studies. It is not an algebraic property of pass@$k$: as Slocum et al. (ICLR 2025) observe, for one fixed task the maximizing temperature is independent of $k$. Building on that fixed-task observation and the hard/easy-task explanation, we give a formal population-level sufficient condition for the aggregate pattern. For task $X$, let $p_t(X)$ be one-sample success probability at temperature $t$, and define the conditional log-success response $m_t(u)=\mathbb{E}[\dot p_t(X)\mid p_t(X)=u]/u$. If $m_t(u)$ is nonincreasing in current success probability, then the normalized temperature derivative of aggregate pass@$k$ is nondecreasing in $k$. Consequently, derivative signs are nested across budgets; if each temperature-performance curve is strictly single-peaked, its unique maximizer is nondecreasing in $k$. The proof identifies the mechanism as a monotone-likelihood-ratio power tilt toward lower-success tasks. We derive a closed-form two-stratum phase diagram, including upward and downward regimes, and show that the marginal temperature derivative admits an exact $\mathrm{Beta}(2,k)$ kernel representation whose kernel concentrates at one-sample success of order $1/k$. Interpreting that scale as task-level localization additionally requires a regular, nonvanishing density-response factor near zero. A signed-moment representation yields diagnostic shape restrictions, while a short appendix records exact discrete refinements of the existing multi-configuration allocation formulation. No language model is trained, and no model query is used as an experimental measurement: the contribution is a conditional theory of an established empirical phenomenon, with assumptions that can be tested in future work. Comments: Theory paper, 13 pages, 1 analytical figure. Deterministic verification code is included as ancillary material. No new language-model experiment Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2608.14665 [cs.LG] (or arXiv:2608.14665v1 [cs.LG] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14665 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Changsu Jeong [ view email ] [v1] Sat, 1 Aug 2026 08:43:36 UTC (48 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled When Does the Best Sampling Temperature Rise with the Budget? Sufficient Conditions for Pass@k, by Changsu Jeong (Independent Researcher) View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Ancillary-file links: Ancillary files ( details ) : REPRODUCIBILITY.txt THEORY_NOTES.txt passk_temperature_theory/__init__.py passk_temperature_theory/make_figure.py passk_temperature_theory/test_extended_theory.py passk_temperature_theory/test_verify_theory.py passk_temperature_theory/verify_theory.py (2 additional files not shown) Current browse context: cs.LG < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) IArxiv recommender toggle IArxiv Recommender ( What is IArxiv? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab) Major funding support from
Related documents
- Breaching 1.5°C: Give me the odds#612751
- Breaching 1.5°C: Give me the odds#611274
- Assets to "Quantifying the tropospheric response to individual sudden stratospheric warmings revealed by an ensemble simulation strategy" by Loeffel et al#206397
- A Grid of Contribution Functions to Help the Interpretation of Time-resolved Observations of Brown Dwarfs#1013936
- Memomind: Criticality-Stratified Learning for Efficient Computation Orchestration#98852
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive