Max-Q Selective Imitation for Human-in-the-Loop Online Robot Learning
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
[2608.15088] Max-Q Selective Imitation for Human-in-the-Loop Online Robot Learning Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Search arXiv Press Enter to search · Advanced search Computer Science > Robotics arXiv:2608.15088 (cs) [Submitted on 15 Aug 2026] Title: Max-Q Selective Imitation for Human-in-the-Loop Online Robot Learning Authors: Zihang Wang , Yishan Wang View a PDF of the paper titled Max-Q Selective Imitation for Human-in-the-Loop Online Robot Learning, by Zihang Wang and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: Human-in-the-loop (HIL) online reinforcement learning for real robots must absorb human interventions quickly while continuing to improve beyond the human prior. We present a training method for this setting based on two components. First, an \emph{MC Q-chunk} critic regresses chunk-level action values onto Monte Carlo returns from the replay buffer, performing sample-average (behavior) policy evaluation so that intervention trajectories are credited directly rather than diluted by current-policy TD backups. Second, \emph{max-Q selective imitation} updates the actor by imitating, at each state, the higher-$Q$ action between the current policy action and a buffer sample under a hard winner-take-all rule. This rule automatically switches between learning from interventions and on-policy self-improvement: when the autonomous policy is stronger, targets align with the policy distribution, reducing the policy--target-sample gap that otherwise induces execution-time distribution shift. In practice we score candidates with a standard critic ensemble mean to reduce comparison noise, without softening targets or introducing score-gap thresholds. On a real USB pick-and-insertion task with 20 demonstrations, ACT QChunk-MCBC attains 99\% success within 30 minutes of HIL training, whereas HIL-SERL requires about 5 hours to converge. In simulation on Peg Insertion and Square, ACT/Flow Q-chunk variants similarly reach $\ge$96\% success within roughly half an hour of effective training, outperforming HIL-SERL, EXPO, and E2HiL on the success--time frontier. Subjects: Robotics (cs.RO) ; Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2608.15088 [cs.RO] (or arXiv:2608.15088v1 [cs.RO] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.15088 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Zihang Wang [ view email ] [v1] Sat, 15 Aug 2026 07:13:59 UTC (1,185 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Max-Q Selective Imitation for Human-in-the-Loop Online Robot Learning, by Zihang Wang and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.RO < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab) Major funding support from
Related documents
- Max-Q Selective Imitation for Human-in-the-Loop Online Robot Learning#611038
- Finite-Sample Theory for Fitted Q-Iteration When Actions Are Functions#1131232
- StructRL: Online Structured Reinforcement Learning for Long-Horizon Vision-Language-Action Tasks#1131194
- ReF-HIL: Shaping the Critic around Human Action Neighborhoods for Efficient Human-in-the-Loop Reinforcement Learning#1132332
- Residual Reward Models: Leveraging Prior Knowledge for Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning in Robotics#677389
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive