OSF
open access
Valid and Reliable? Basic and Expanded Recommendations for Psychometric Reporting and Quality Assessment
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Training program evaluation in non-standardized context: Comple-mentarity across Factorial and Multilevel Analysis to obtain construct valid-ity evidences [Evaluación de programas de formación continua en contextos no estandarizados: Complementariedad entre análisis factorial y multinivel para la obtención de evidencias de validez de constructo]#948507
- The Turkish version of the quality in psychiatric care-inpatient scale: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric evaluation.#9403
- How reliable are subjective ratings? The issue of reliability in psycholinguistic measures of sign frequency and iconicity in German Sign Language (DGS)#672351
- How reliable are subjective ratings? The issue of reliability in psycholinguistic measures of sign frequency and iconicity in German Sign Language (DGS)#672147
- How to measure Integrated Reporting Adoption, compliance, and Quality: A Systematic Review of taxonomies, constructs, and measures toward a research agenda#356960
Record · ID 637586
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive