Shoaie v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026fc1114, 2026 fc 1114 (canlii), 2026, fc, 1114, (canlii), imm-5255-25, 2026, administrative law, judicial review, reasonableness, work permit refusal under start, up visa class, whether officer reasonably found only vague explanations of urgency, business proposal not synonymous with urgent business need for immediate work, record reviewed including commitment certificate, business plan, and representative submissions, application for judicial review dismissed, citizenship and immigration, work permits, start, up visa class, refusal for lack of urgency, whether urgency for the work permit was sufficiently explained, commitment certificate or letter of support and business plan considered, officer’s finding that only vague explanations were provided upheld as reasonable, application for judicial review dismissed, procedure, procedural fairness, notice of concerns, whether applicant was entitled to be notified of concerns about missing “permissions” and “authorizations”, absence of evidence supporting applicant’s own submission, not adverse credibility or extrinsic evidence, majid v canada (citizenship and immigration), khani v canada (citizenship and immigration) applied, application for judicial review dismissed