Raeisi Ardali v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026fc1109, 2026 fc 1109 (canlii), 2026, fc, 1109, (canlii), imm-4120-25, 2026, administrative law, judicial review, reasonableness, vavilov framework, reasons first approach and administrative context, whether decision lacks transparency, intelligibility and justification, officer required to explain why provided information insufficient, serious shortcomings on a key point, application for judicial review allowed, citizenship and immigration, temporary resident visa, proof of funds, immigration and refugee protection regulations, para. 179(b), whether refusal unreasonable on assessment of available funds including host support, provenance of funds and sufficiency for short visit, weighing funds and departure at end of stay, decision set aside, administrative law, reasons, justification, whether officer could require a transaction summary to confirm provenance, no apparent reason in gcms notes for the requirement, reviewing court not to fashion its own reasons (vavilov), failure to explain why requirement applied and why other proof was insufficient, matter remitted, citizenship and immigration, temporary resident visa instructions, host support documentation, ankara visa office instructions (imm 5855), whether officer failed to engage with evidence of host’s professional income, monthly contractor fees from optometry practice as provenance of funds, no explanation why income evidence insufficient, decision unreasonable, administrative law, remedies, remittal, whether appropriate remedy is to set aside and remit for redetermination by a different decision maker, opportunity to provide updated information given passage of time, no question of general importance stated, decision set aside and matter remitted for redetermination