Montano Riascos v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026fc1113, 2026 fc 1113 (canlii), 2026, fc, 1113, (canlii), imm-16639-24, 2026, administrative law, judicial review, reasonableness, vavilov framework, whether the court should intervene where doing so would require reweighing the evidence, hallmarks of justification, transparency and intelligibility, holistic reading of reasons in light of the record, limits on reconsidering country condition evidence on review, application for judicial review dismissed, citizenship and immigration, refugee protection, internal flight alternative, second prong unreasonableness, whether cumulative hardships tied to afro, colombian profile and systemic discrimination make the ifa objectively unreasonable, barriers to housing, education, health care and employment raised, “actual and concrete evidence” and high threshold applied, ifa found reasonable, application for judicial review dismissed, citizenship and immigration, refugee protection, internal flight alternative, country condition evidence, whether national documentation package evidence of systemic discrimination is “general conditions” insufficient to make an ifa unreasonable, reliance on mansour and ranganathan principles, no personalized evidence of specific discrimination or threats found, general conditions not determinative, rad analysis upheld, application for judicial review dismissed