CanLIImetadata only
Donadze v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026fc1108, 2026 fc 1108 (canlii), 2026, fc, 1108, (canlii), imm-9400-24, 2026, citizenship and immigration, refugee protection, judicial review, credibility, whether new evidence was inadmissible for lack of credibility under immigration and refugee protection act, s. 110(4), raza v canada (citizenship and immigration) factors applied to source and circumstances, similar language, timing, discrepancies assessed, refusal to admit new evidence upheld, citizenship and immigration, refugee appeal division, procedural fairness, whether notice and an opportunity to respond was required before refusing new evidence for lack of credibility, consistent federal court jurisprudence cited, including hossain v canada (citizenship and immigration), no procedural unfairness in refusing to admit letters without notice, procedural fairness argument rejected, citizenship and immigration, refugee protection, credibility, reasonableness, whether a material credibility finding was unintelligible and illogical under vavilov, discrepancy concerning husband’s alleged assault relied on to reject link to agent of persecution, logical nexus not explained, decision set aside and remitted to differently constituted panel for redetermination
This document is indexed with metadata only — full text is not available in the archive for this record.
Open the official source ↗
Related documents
Record · ID 638364
Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive — every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.