CanLIImetadata only
Gibson v. British Columbia (Adult Forensic Psychiatric Services)
canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, bcca, 2026bcca367, 2026 bcca 367 (canlii), 2026, bcca, 367, (canlii), ca51523, 2026, criminal and statutory offences, review board dispositions, ncrmd detention, appeal from custodial disposition after annual review under criminal code, s. 672.81(1), continued detention in hospital ordered under criminal code, s. 672.54(c) with conditions, prior custody dispositions and repeated appeals noted, court finds no reviewable error, appeal dismissed, evidence, appellate review, disposition “unsupported by the evidence”, whether board disposition was unreasonable or cannot be supported by the evidence, criminal code, s. 672.78(1)(a), treatment team reports, structured risk assessment, and oral evidence considered, findings on delusions, insight, and violence risk upheld as defensible, appeal dismissed, criminal and statutory offences, public safety risk, significant threat, whether appellant remained a significant threat to the safety of the public under criminal code, s. 672.5401 and winko v. british columbia (forensic psychiatric institute), detention found necessary due to ongoing delusions, substance misuse risk, and violence history, discharge plan insufficient to manage risk, appeal dismissed, procedure, appeals, standard of review, reasonableness and deference on appeal from review board disposition under criminal code, s. 672.78, board expertise in assessing risk and treatment needs emphasised, citing r. v. owen and related authorities, court confined to record before board and acceptable and defensible outcome, appeal dismissed
This document is indexed with metadata only — full text is not available in the archive for this record.
Open the official source ↗
Related documents
Record · ID 638411
Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive — every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.