Bahinipaty v. Vancouver Coastal Health Authority (Vancouver General Hospital)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, bcca, 2026bcca359, 2026 bcca 359 (canlii), 2026, bcca, 359, (canlii), ca51522, 2026, procedure, appeals, extension of time, court of appeal rules, rule 6, davies v. c.i.b.c. criteria, whether there was a bona fide intention to appeal within time, prejudice and interests of justice weighed, potential merit considered central, extension of time to file notice of appeal granted, procedure, court fees, no fees order, court of appeal rules, r. 85(6), whether payment of court fees would cause undue hardship, whether the appeal is “bound to fail”, gross household income and inability to generate income considered, appeal not bound to fail on negligence issue, no fees order granted, evidence, expert evidence, opinion evidence, supreme court civil rules, r. 11, 2, whether appellant’s medical opinions were inadmissible as not impartial, distinction between independent experts and “participant expert” considered, whether r. 11, 2 applies to a litigant with expertise involved in events, potential merit in appeal of negligence dismissal found, procedure, summary trial, suitability and discretion, supreme court civil rules, rule 9, 7, whether judge erred in deciding the matter could be resolved summarily, deferential standard on discretionary decision to proceed by summary trial, detailed analysis of suitability considerations noted, no error in reasons discerned, no arguable error found