Surrey (City) v British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, bcca, 2026bcca346, 2026 bcca 346 (canlii), 2026, bcca, 346, (canlii), ca51001, 2026, public utilities, utilities regulation, municipal street or highway dedication, terms of use for high voltage transmission facilities, statutory leave to appeal from utilities commission decision imposing relocation cost allocation, application to vary chambers order refusing leave, leave granted on a single issue within the utility regulatory scheme, procedure, chambers applications, application to vary, court of appeal act, s. 29, standard of review for varying a discretionary order refusing leave, correctness where decision is solely based on lack of merit considered, error in principle in summarily determining arguable issue, application granted, statutory interpretation, utilities commission act, right of entry and deemed cpcn, utilities commission act, ss. 32(1)(a), 45(2), whether deemed cpcn provides a right to enter a municipality to place facilities, interrelationship within complex statutory scheme, issue not directly decided in prior authorities, leave to appeal granted, procedure, leave to appeal, statutory leave factors, queens plate dev. ltd. v vancouver assessor, whether an arguable but weak statutory interpretation issue warrants leave, gatekeeper role and “substantial questions to be argued” applied, high stakes and potential general importance weighed, leave to appeal granted on one issue only