R. v R.P.

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, nlca, 2026nlca19, 2026 nlca 19 (canlii), 2026, nlca, 19, (canlii), 202401h0043, 2026, criminal and statutory offences, sexual offences, appeal from conviction, sexual assault, sexual interference, criminal code, ss. 271, 151, convictions challenged on questions of law and miscarriage of justice, trial judge accepted complainant’s evidence and rejected blanket denial, acquittals entered on some counts, appeal dismissed, evidence, misapprehension of evidence, sufficiency of reasons, whether trial judge failed to consider material evidence on reasonable doubt, contradictory testimony of accused’s partner, video games, pregnancy test, location on bed, credibility and reliability assessment under r. v. w.(d.), no reversible error, appeal dismissed, rights and freedoms, charter, police investigation deficiencies, whether trial judge imposed burden on accused to establish a charter breach, inadequate investigation, tunnel vision, unrecorded conversations, failure to interview witnesses, relevance to crown burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, no conjecture about ideal investigation, no legal error, appeal dismissed, evidence, credibility, collateral facts, whether trial judge misapprehended evidence on alleged bribe and message left with police, defence claim complainant “caught in a lie”, grandmother’s evidence and rcmp evidence on absence of record, trial judge found issue collateral and no lie established, no miscarriage of justice, appeal dismissed