R v Tuluqtuq

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, nuca, 2025nuca5, 2025 nuca 5 (canlii), 2025, nuca, 5, (canlii), 15-24-9-cas, 2025, criminal procedure, sentencing, imposition of illegal sentence, appellant convicted of sexual assault under section 271 of the criminal code, sentencing judge imposed a sentence exceeding the maximum allowed for summary conviction, did the sentencing judge err by imposing an illegal sentence?, maximum sentence for summary conviction under section 271(b) is 18 months unless the complainant is under 16 years old, criminal procedure, joint submissions, public interest test, sentencing judge rejected joint submission for a conditional sentence order, did the sentencing judge err in rejecting the joint submission?, public interest test from r v anthony, cook requires joint submissions to be accepted unless they would bring the administration of justice into disrepute, criminal procedure, sentencing afresh, appellate court required to sentence afresh after finding errors in sentencing judge’s decision, joint submission for a 120, day conditional sentence order and 12, month probation order accepted, should the appellate court impose the joint submission?, framework for sentencing afresh under anthony, cook and r v kritaqliluk, statutory interpretation, criminal code, maximum sentence for summary conviction under section 271(b), sentencing judge imposed a sentence exceeding the statutory maximum, did the sentencing judge err in interpreting the sentencing provisions of the criminal code?, section 271(b) limits imprisonment to 18 months for summary conviction unless the complainant is under 16 years old