R v Ittigaitok

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, nuca, 2025nuca2, 2025 nuca 2 (canlii), 2025, nuca, 2, (canlii), 18-20-014-cap, 2025, criminal procedure, appeals, extension of time to appeal, dangerous offender designation, long, term supervision orders, appellant filed late appeal arguing designation unreasonable and sentence uninformed, delay of 18 months for filing notice of appeal, was the appellant entitled to an extension based on the interests of justice?, factors from r v ammar and r v canto govern extensions of appeal deadlines, criminal procedure, dangerous offender designation, trial judge’s findings, predicate offence, criteria in criminal code, s. 753, joint submission by the parties, was the trial judge's acceptance of the designation reasonable, and did it comply with statutory requirements?, the presumption under s. 753(1.1) and its proper application, criminal procedure, sentencing, joint submissions, long, term supervision orders (ltso), sentence based on joint recommendation of three years and six, year ltso, did the trial judge err in accepting the joint submission for sentencing?, stringent test for joint submissions under r v anthony, cook, evidence, dangerous offender assessments, language of assessment, appellant contended assessment should have been conducted in inuktitut, assessment completed in english with appellant’s consent, was the dangerous offender assessment proper without linguistic accommodations?, the appellant must provide evidence of compromise in communication to argue procedural deficiencies, indigenous peoples, sentencing, gladue principles, absence of a formal gladue report, indigenous appellant raised issue post, sentencing, trial judge took judicial notice of systemic indigenous disparities, did the trial court adequately consider gladue factors notwithstanding the absence of a formal report?, judicial notice under r v ipeelee regarding colonialism’s impact on indigenous offenders