Kaur v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026fc1123, 2026 fc 1123 (canlii), 2026, fc, 1123, (canlii), imm-3291-25, 2026, citizenship and immigration, work permits and study permits, judicial review, spousal work permit refused for “insufficient information” about canadian employment in a qualifying teer category, dependent children’s study permits also refused, refusal set aside and matter remitted to a different officer for redetermination, judicial review granted, administrative law, reasonableness review, vavilov, whether the officer’s finding of “insufficient evidence” corresponded with the evidence before the officer, concern about “inconsistent regularity of deposits” and its role in refusal not explained, reasons impossible to understand, rendering decision unreasonable (canada (minister of citizenship and immigration) v vavilov), refusal set aside, evidence, documentary evidence, material evidence, whether the officer was obligated to mention and analyse evidence that was not “superficial or peripheral”, closed work permit, employment verification letter, positive labour market impact assessment, employment contract, paycheques and bank statements pointed to a different conclusion, failure to grapple with evidence (cepeda, gutierrez), judicial review granted