Zahrebelnyi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fca, 2026fca134, 2026 fca 134 (canlii), 2026, fca, 134, (canlii), a-276-25, 2026, citizenship and immigration, inadmissibility, immigration and refugee protection act, ss. 34, 42, motion to stay effects of inadmissibility determination and permanent residence refusal decision pending appeal, rjr, macdonald inc. v. canada (attorney general) test applied, irreparable harm not shown, balance of convenience favours upholding statutory scheme, stay refused, procedure, stays, jurisdiction and remedies, whether the stay sought is tantamount to directing officers to disregard the immigration and refugee protection act, jp morgan asset management (canada) inc. v. canada (national revenue) and mamut v. canada (citizenship and immigration) considered, discretionary stay power not used to enable discordant administrative decision, making, motion dismissed, procedure, motions, oral hearing, federal courts rules, rule 369.2, whether exceptional circumstances justify oral hearing on stay motion, written record on irreparable harm readily comprehensible, court practice limiting oral hearings on motions applied, lafond v. canada (immigration, refugees and citizenship) cited, oral hearing denied