R. v Robert Barry Moore

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, pescad, 2025peca6, 2025 peca 6 (canlii), 2025, peca, 6, (canlii), s1-ca-1511, 2025, criminal and statutory offences, criminal harassment, criminal code, s. 264, appeal against conviction, whether errors in cross, examination and hearsay rulings limited defence, criminal code, s. 686(1)(b)(iii) curative proviso not invoked by crown, conviction quashed and new trial ordered, evidence, cross, examination, credibility, canada evidence act, s. 12, whether defence was wrongly denied cross, examination on corporate fraud convictions and professional misconduct findings, trial judge failed to assess probative value and prejudicial effect, unwarranted interference with cross, examination, new trial ordered, evidence, hearsay, purpose of tendered evidence, whether out, of, court statement was excluded without considering use and effect on listener, r. v. starr, r. v. camara, trial judge refused fulsome discussion of admissibility and purpose, error in law limiting defence, new trial ordered, procedure, appeals, misapprehension of evidence, miscarriage of justice, whether trial judge misapprehended evidence by relying on complaints to authorities, strict test from r. v. lohrer and r. v. sinclair, disagreement with inferences does not establish misapprehension, ground of appeal dismissed