Mansoursharifloo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026fc1111, 2026 fc 1111 (canlii), 2026, fc, 1111, (canlii), imm-6963-25, 2026, administrative law, judicial review, mandamus, apotex v canada (attorney general), conille v. canada (minister of citizenship and immigration), whether delay was unreasonable so mandamus should issue, “approved pending info from partners” and prolonged inaction in processing, demand for decision and implied refusal by unreasonable delay, application granted, citizenship and immigration, temporary resident visas, security screening, immigration and refugee protection act, s 11(1), whether ongoing security screening justified the delay, “approved pending info from partners” with no evidence of complexity or non, routine concerns, requirement for publicly disclosable explanation for lengthy screening, mandamus issued, administrative law, remedies, discretion, benison v canada (royal canadian mounted police external review committee), whether mandamus should be denied under the last four apotex factors, adequate alternative remedy, practical value, equitable bar, balance of convenience, respondent’s burden to lead evidence not met, no evidentiary basis to refuse relief, mandamus granted, administrative law, mandamus, time limits, whether the court should impose a deadline to render a decision, compelling decision “as soon as possible”, respondent sought longer period without evidence, expeditious determination required without curtailing remaining screening, decision required within 60 days, order issued within 60 days