Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. British Columbia (Attorney General)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, bcca, 2026bcca372, 2026 bcca 372 (canlii), 2026, bcca, 372, (canlii), ca51535; ca51536, 2026, procedure, interventions, court of appeal practice, application for leave to intervene on pending appeals, whether applicant can assist the court under rule 61, written hearing directed and materials reviewed, notice of application dismissed, no order as to costs, constitution, constitutional litigation, legal professions act, appeals challenge dismissal of constitutional claims, whether proposed intervener should be granted leave on appeals raising constitutionality of bill 21, applicant found to have no genuine or serious interest, no legitimate basis for intervention, application dismissed, constitution, public interest intervener status, standing, whether applicant has a direct interest or qualifies as a public interest intervener, no direct interest in rights or obligations affected, halalt first nation v. british columbia (environment), no unique perspective or representative base, british columbia civil liberties association v. canada (attorney general), intervention refused, procedure, case management, scope of relief on interlocutory application, notice of application sought orders beyond intervener request, whether ancillary orders were grounded in appeal issues or procedural rules, requests to refer appeals for summary determination and deny standing rejected as unrelated, application dismissed, procedure, court filings, court of appeal rules, rule 61, whether a second argument may be filed on the same intervener application, further argument not authorised under rule 61, registry directed not to accept document for filing, application dismissed