PhilArchive
open access
Los derechos humanos: ¿política normal o política revolucionaria?
What sort of animal are human rights? Are they ethical, political or cultural artefacts? In this article, I deal with the question of human rights comparing the interpretation given by those that defend a notion of «normal politics» - engaged exclusively with the prevention of «absolute evil», and those who defend a “politics of imagination” that denounce the ubiquity of systemic evil. Advocates of normal politics of human rights are inspired by a spirit of restoration. The promoters of a politics of imagination, or revolutionary politics, are inspired by the «Principle of Hope».
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Kantianism for Animals#83576
- IS PET-KEEPING A VIOLATION OF ANIMAL RIGHTS? A CONSEQUENTIALIST STANDPOINT#102040
- Respect, Inherent Value, Subjects-of-a-Life: Some Reflections on the Key Concepts of Tom Regan’s Animal Ethics#116176
- Tutela da efetividade dos direitos e deveres fundamentais pelos Tribunais de Contas: direito/dever fundamental à boa administração pública (e derivações) e direitos fundamentais à saúde e à educação#947239
- Justicia para ciudadanos y extranjeros#722616
Record · ID 692078
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive