PhilArchive
open access
Why Kant is not a Meinongian
In this article, I will not only attempt to defend the Kantian position regarding existence from a series of recent criticisms from some analytic philosophers, but I will also try to demonstrate that, to effectively respond to such criticisms, one must resort to the analytic tradition itself and in particular, to the Fregean idea that existence is a quantifier.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- La noción de existencia en Kant#74628
- Against Non-Identity Phenomenalism#709251
- Kant on Language and the (Self‐)Development of Reason#729947
- The Nature of Appearance in Kant’s Transcendentalism: A Seman- tico-Cognitive Analysis#744064
- Kant on Moral Agency: Beyond the Incorporation Thesis#775642
Record · ID 693179
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive