PhilArchive
open access
The Twin Analogy: A Philosophical Response to the Problem of Other Minds
The problem of other minds remains one of the central and most persistent challenges in philosophy of mind, raising the question of how we can reasonably justify the belief that other human beings, apart from ourselves, possess conscious experiences. Traditional explanations, such as analogical reasoning and behaviourist approaches, have attempted to answer this challenge, yet none has fully resolved the scepticism attached to it. In this paper, we introduce a biological perspective designated as The Twin Analogy. This analogy takes its foundation from the case of biological twins who, though separated as distinct beings at birth, share the same organs, body structure, and genetic basis. From this shared biological foundation, it becomes rational to infer that if one twin possesses a mind, the other must also possess one. Such a move provides a biological ground for attributing mindedness beyond the self. The analogy is not intended merely as a thought experiment but as a practical framework for wider debates in philosophy of mind, with implications for artificial intelligence, intersubjectivity, and moral philosophy.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Problem of Other AI Minds#730423
- Title: The Unobjectifiable: Why Phenomenal Consciousness Cannot Be a Variable in Scientific Explanation#723760
- The Methodological Status of the Experiencing Subjects in Consciousness Research#693274
- The evolution and development of consciousness: the subject-object emergence hypothesis#720009
- The Unobjectifiable: Why Phenomenal Consciousness Cannot Be a Variable in Scientific Explanation#721765
Record · ID 696440
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive