PhilArchive
open access
The IPCC Uncertainty Framework: What Decision Makers Want (and Why They Shouldn't)
In “Combining probability with qualitative degree-of-certainty metrics in assessment,” Helgeson et al. present a mathematical model of the confidence-likelihood relationship in the IPCC uncertainty framework. Their goal is to resolve ambiguities in the framework and clarify the roles of “confidence” and “likelihood” in decision-making. In this paper, I provide a conceptual evaluation of their proposal. I argue that the IPCC cannot implement the model coherently and that adopting it could result in unclear and potentially misleading communication of uncertainty.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Confidence in naturalistic decision making.#297415
- Intolerance of Uncertainty Predicts Physiological and Subjective Responses to Experiential Uncertainty#286132
- How Spatial Uncertainty in Probabilistic Weather Forecasts Shapes Risk Perception#16498
- Perceiving Uncertainty: how visual encoding, socially mediated doubt, and task complexity influence human decision-making#15829
- Measuring (some aspects of) the metacognition of AI#1129212
Record · ID 696875
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive