PhilArchive
open access
The Myth of Phenomenological Overflow
In this paper I examine the dispute between Hakwan Lau, Ned Block, and David Rosenthal over the extent to which empirical results can help us decide between first-order and higher-order theories of consciousness. What emerges from this is an overall argument to the best explanation against the first-order view of consciousness and the dispelling of the mythological notion of phenomenological overflow that comes with it.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Euthyphro Dilemma for Higher-order Theories of Consciousness#771072
- Must Consciousness Always Be “Consciousness of Something”?#688536
- De Husserl à Heidegger : intentionnalité, monde et sens#761535
- Downgraded phenomenology: how conscious overflow lost its richness#776394
- Editorial: Standing on the Verge: Lessons and Limits from the Empirical Study of Consciousness#703472
Record · ID 703501
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive