PhilArchive
open access
AI doesn’t care about Ethics: Why technoskepticism must be political
In my latest book, Artificial Intelligence and Barbarism: A Critique of Digital Reason, I argue for a critical approach to AI, Technoskepticism based on Digital Humanism. In February, the DISCO Network released its book “Technoskepticism, Between Possibility and Refusal” as a survival strategy for marginalized groups against systemic inequity. The consensus is clear: we must be skeptical of Artificial Intelligence and see technology as inherently linked to power. However, the differences are also important for a more political interpretation of democratic technoskepticism.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Artificial Intelligence and Barbarism: A Critique of Digital Reason#100289
- The Algorithmic Authoritarianism Hypothesis: AI, Power, and the Decline of Liberal Democracy#75488
- A Companion to Applied Philosophy of AI#73855
- Disclosure and dissolution: explainability, AI power, and situated agency in understanding#974067
- The Stories We Govern By: AI, Risk, and the Power of Imaginaries#171884
Record · ID 705103
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive