PhilArchive
open access
Reasons and Attitude Intensity
Suppose you have most reason to worry. Then you ought to worry. But how worried should you be? This chapter gives an explanation of facts about appropriate attitude intensity in terms of facts about reasons. A package of principles is defended according to which every reason to hold (or not hold) an attitude is a reason to hold (or not hold) the attitude above various intensities. It is argued that these principles give an elegant explanation of the facts at issue, once they’re combined with the idea that reasons derivatively favour the optimal ways of doing what they non-derivatively favour (Kiesewetter & Gertken 2021). By appealing to reasons, we can not only explain which attitudes we ought to hold, but also how strongly we ought to hold them.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Proper Work of the Intellect#773622
- The Epistemology of Anger in Argumentation#740842
- Context in the attitudes#712925
- Comments on “The Emulating Interview... with Rick Grush”#768683
- The Myside Bias in Argument Evaluation: A Bayesian Model#86733
Record · ID 705148
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive