Conceptio › Archive › PhilArchive
PhilArchive open access

The Tongue Cannot Taste Itself: Perspectival Entrapment and the Form of First-Person Intuitions

Trukovich, J.
PhilArchive · Papers
Open Source ↗
philosophy
Certain first-person intuitions about consciousness — that feeling makes things matter, that there is a genuine gap between physical and phenomenal descriptions, that we exercise agency in choosing, that phenomenal qualities have intrinsic character no third-personal description captures — recur with remarkable consistency across cultures, philosophical traditions, and historical periods. They resist revision through sophisticated reflection: philosophers who develop arguments against them continue to have them. Contemporary philosophy of mind has organized its debates around taking these intuitions as theory-neutral data, as confused folk views, or as systematic illusions. This paper develops a fourth response. The diagnostic strategy treats universal first-person intuitions about consciousness as architectural data about the systems that produce them. When an intuition is universal across reflective traditions, resilient under intellectual challenge, and architecturally specifiable, it is what the architecture has to produce when it tries to characterize itself from within. The strategy credits what the intuition correctly registers at the architectural-condition level while declining the content claims about what those conditions must be in themselves. The strategy's broadest contribution is the recognition that folk reflection, philosophical reflection, and contemplative practice across Buddhist, Vedantic, Sufi, Christian-apophatic, and Daoist traditions are three engagements with the same architectural feature — perspectival entrapment under significance-saturation in recursive self-modeling under autopoietic stakes. Applications to feeling-priority, the hard problem, agency, qualia and phenomenal concepts, and the cross-cultural contemplative engagement demonstrate the strategy's range. The strategy is empirically tractable: its predictions are testable against developmental, pathological, comparative, contemplative-neuroscience, and AI-consciousness cases.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 709195
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive